Skip to main content

Donald Hrehor Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I have reviewed this proposal and am completely against it. Restricting investment is a sure way to continue to bring the market down. I also question the logic of enacting something like this AFTER the market has gone down 20% due to other failed policies by this administration seems like a sure fire way to attempt to keep the "peasants" in their rightful place.

If this is enacted, it will keep those that lost when the market went down from recovering those assets when the market returns to normal.

Douglas Jensen Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Im fully capable of making my own financial decisions without the need to be protected from myself by anyone ! Ive been successful all of my life without unsolicited advice. Leveraged and inverse funds help me to hedge and out perform better. Leverage funds allow me to react quickly to changing market conditions. This is a valuable tool I use and have for over twelve (12) years. The prospectuses give all you need to know about the risks associated with leveraged funds. Please dont put unnecessary roadblocks in my path because someone will not research their investment.

Thomas Daugherty Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I object to the proposed regulation that proposes to limit my access to certain investment vehicles. I consider any paternalistic regulations purporting to protect my interests as an invasion of my right to make my own investment decisions. In the matter of the leveraged and inverse ETFs being suggested for regulation, note that each presently carries declarations and warnings to investor. We need that type of disclosure but we do not need a governmental babysitter to decide which investment vehicle we choose to use.