| FINRA.org Skip to main content

Eric Masselle Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

How dare you even think about making it more difficult for the general public to save for retirement. That you lump inverse funds along with leveraged funds is particularly damaging; you want the general public to try shorting stocks, really? You think that's less difficult than buying an inverse fund? Inverse ETFs are extremely important to my own trading, and have saved me more than once (think early 2020). But your attack on leveraged funds is also completely misguided -- you think you can remove risk from the market? Do any of you own Netflix?

Timothy Neal Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I am writing due to possible restrictions on buying inverse funds. I feel it is everyone's right to invest in any public funds and they should not be limited to a few. Any investing has a certain amount of risk and there should not be certain funds that require additional training or a set amount of personal assets. I use inverse funds as part of my portfolio to hedge against the variations that come with a fluctuating market.

Donald Byrge Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

There is not any problem that needs to be solved with respect to leveraged and inverse ETFs. Leveraged and inverse ETFs are critical components of my trading and investing; they allow me to achieve enhanced returns and also help me to protect my portfolio during market downturns. I have actively traded and invested for over 30 years and monitor my accounts on a daily basis. I am certainly capable of understanding how leveraged and inverse ETFs perform in various market conditions over both short and long time periods.