Skip to main content

Jennifer Mann Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I oppose this regulation because it limits my public investment options that fit within my risk tolerance. I am capable of making my own strategic investment decisions without the government imposing limitations. I understand leveraged and inverse funds and associated risks and do not think I should have to go through a special process or test before investing in these types of public securities.

James Lawson Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I oppose this proposed regulation because it is over reaching, limiting investors ability, is over reacting to a very small minority of people and does not reflect the vast majority of investors. If the mandate is to protect the public, then require wording and risks for leveraged or inverse funds. There is a place for inverse funds, particularly when markets are declining. and investors should have the ability and choice to be hedge their funds.

Douglas Shepherd Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Hello, Surely there are more direct ways to protect citizens that are not competent to invest their own money than interfering with normal activities of average investors. Leveraged and inverse funds are regulated public securities that are easier to understand than the average computer screen used by investors. They are a part of my everyday investment tactics and do not need any further restrictions.