Skip to main content

Jeffrey Hamilton Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

With over 40 years trading experience, inclusive of options, I utilize inverse ETFs as a means of insurance against unknown market events; typically limited to less than10% of total assets. These market tools are valid investments and like all tools in all disciples, when used correctly, enable individuals to complete tasks. Education NOT restriction should rule the day. We live in a free market society of willing buyers and willing sellers; we do not need excessive FINRA involvement; EDUCATION is the answer.

Andrew Grant Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Personalized financial risk should not regulated or decided by a 3rd party. Individuals should be allowed under a freestanding republic to partake in behavior that is deemed by others as risky if it does not harm nor impose on others freedoms. This is such a case. individuals should be allowed to decide their own personal fate, not be dictated/FORCED by others no matter how well intentioned....even ill-intended...those those may be.

Steven Lang Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I have been using leveraged and/or inverse ETFs, according to market conditions and my specific investment goals, for more than fifteen years. They are vital to hedging strategies, and they deliver greater performance for fewer invested dollars, making them more efficient in many different circumstances than standard ETFs or direct equity investments. I can make my own decisions, and I don't need anyone protecting me from myself.