I am opposed to FINRA Regulatory notice # 22-08.

The decision for such investments should lie between a broker and an investor, akin to the relationship between a doctor and patient.

If additional investment risk information is needed, FINRA should promulgate it. I am and have been capable of understanding the investment risk with these investments for some time. I do not need the consequences imposed by Notice #22-08.

Please reconsider this action. There are enough safeguards and warnings in place currently. The issuers are really good about letting the buyer know how these work, and risks involved. They are an important part of my trading strategy.

Thank you for your consideration.

It was shocking of knowing that our regulators plan to limit our right to invest in leveraged and inverses funds. Certainly, we understand the risk of investing and the choice of risk and reward should be left to the investors. The investment choices and the type of investments should be open to all, but not just a few privileged, i.e. the wealthy ones, and the investment firms...etc. As an individual investor, I understand that it is my decision to do the due diligence before I invest. It is not difficult to find information in internet age.

Dear Regulator,

I should have the right to decide my own risk profile and invest how I see fit. By allowing some to invest in this and others not, you are failing a portion of the entire investor group.

The proposed additional regulation regarding limiting access and tradability of inverse, leveraged and volatility ETPs is nonsensical and plain wrong. Investing is a way for the masses to generate wealth, one small chunk at a time. Not everyone needs to be an accredited investor in order to be able to buy more complicated financial products than common stock and government bonds.

I dont need anyone limiting way I use Etf or other securities levered or unlevered. Its America. We all know our risk profiles. Caveat emptor

I think I can choose the public investments, that are right for me and my family.

I can understand leveraged and inverse funds and their risks.

Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies. they help my protect (hedge) my investments or seek enhanced returns.I use them as a limited part of my overall portfolio.

The ability for small investors to make money in the market is hard enough given all the advantages that Wall Street has been given. Now you are considering giving then another one. What is wrong with you?!? I have invested in leveraged and inverse funds for years and they are a critical income stream for retirement. Dont give Wall Street another advantage they dont need. As a regulator you dont have the right to tell me I cant invest in a product and allow the privileged few to continue.

I have recently used small inverse funds to help me hedge the terrible fall in my stocks. If not for these funds, I would have considered selling off many more of my holdings at losses rather than take even more risk. Is this really what you want? Please don't add any restrictions.