Skip to main content

Randall Burkhart Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Sir/Madam,
Please do not restrict my ability to make investments in the stock market however I choose to make them. By limiting my access to inverse and leveraged funds, you are effectively reducing my ability to improve the outlook for my retirement future. I am aware of the risks involved, but these risks are, in my mind, no greater than the risk already inherent in the market itself, but with a shorter timespan for profit or loss. As an investor, I am already well aware of that risk, and feel I do not need a government entity to take that opportunity away.

John Derevlany Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Please continue allowing me the freedom to invest in leverage and inverse funds, without any special, government required mandates I'm aware that these are risky investments, and use them sparingly, mostly to hedge other investments or as an alternatives to options. They are an inexpensive way to get an outsized return. My broker (Charles Schwab) is very good about warning me about the risks of these investments, which is why I use them cautiously. Please allow me the freedom to make my own decisions about my investments Thank you.

Ketan Patil Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

FINRAs scheme is misguided because it: Hurts Investors: It could potentially deny us the freedom to choose investments that could help us achieve long-term financial security. Is Arbitrary and Unworkable: FINRAs definition of complex products is so broad, arbitrary and vague that it could ensnare a vast number of commonly used public securities. Tests or Upends Our Regulatory System: Under the long-standing disclosure-based system, investors have the right to decide which public equities, bonds and funds they want to buy.