Skip to main content

Timothy Healey Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

FINRA's entire concept of restrictions for leveraged and inverse funds and dozens of other popular investments deemed to be complex is totally un-American and smacks of nannyism at its worse.
No one is forced to make any of these investments and some people are more risk averse than others. Investors should know their own limits.
Sports betting or casino gambling have risks too, but no one is forced to show any knowledge or horse racing, or attest to a sports team knowledge before placing a bet.
Several rules of thumb to follow prior to investing:

Mark Shafer Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Sirs: As an investment advisor with over 35 years experience, please accept this message as my opposition to regulation changes being considered regarding Inverse and Leveraged ETF's.

It is my belief that the advisor and/or the investing public should have the right to make investment choices for their accounts. Not the regulators.

As an experienced advisor, I believe I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks therefore do not believe additional public securities tests are necessary.

Anthony Ray Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I have been licensed with the FINRA for over thirty (30) years. The advent of ETF leveraged, non leveraged, inverse, and none inverse have been of great service to the investment community of professionals and nonprofessionals.

I am encouraging you to increase the accessibility and availability of the entire variety of ETF products to the entire investment community without added regulations.