Skip to main content

James Zehe Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I believe it is my right to choose what public investments are right for me and my family, I also believe they should be available to all, not just the privileged few. I do not believe it is right to require a test before I can invest in leveraged and inverse funds. These are only a small part of my investments, however they help enhance and protect my investments overall.

I believe that the SEC should be working for my and other citizens interests, and not those who would hold us down.

Pinchas Kohler Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I would like to request that FINRA not restrict our ability to purchase leveraged and inverse funds.
Modern Portfolio Theory postulates that our main resource for profit is a function of risk. Almost any investment can have its risk dialed up or down to meet our financial needs.
So, it is prudent to allow all investors the ability to decide for themselves and take personal responsibility for their investment decisions. We cannot decide that one should pick individual stocks instead of leveraged Treasuries or gold for example.

Diana Raggett Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I oppose restrictions to my right to invest in leveraged and inverse funds. These instruments should be available to the public, and not just a privileged few. They are an important part of investment strategy that can help me hedge/ protect my stocks investments, and sometimes help me achieve enhanced returns when I use them as a limited part of my overall portfolio. I should not have to go through an special process such as passing a test before I can invest in them; I feel the risk in investing in them can be less than investing in individual stocks.