Skip to main content

John Hull Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I am extremely disappointed that limiting our investments in leverage/inverse products is even being considered. I have invested in these products for years. The idea of a bureaucratic determination of the complexity of an investment, of which these are not, seems to be overly vague, unconstitutional and violative of our civil rights. Please note my strong opposition to any proposal to limit our rights of investment opportunities in leveraged and inverse shares.

Robert Mccartney Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

We don't need more of the nanny state trying to protect us, especially as the federal government creates property and stock market bubbles with their insane federal reserve policies. Perhaps your time would be better spent worrying about the fact the govt is bankrupting the country instead of hand holding investors. Let the free market work. We already get plenty of notification of the potential for loss investing in these leveraged fund products - we don't need the rest of your hand holding..

Mohsin Bajwa Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I am writing to state that I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks.