Skip to main content

Richard Silverman Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I purchased a leveraged and inverse fund to play the rise in interest rates. I looked at the alternatives, decided how much risk I was comfortable taking, and purchased a 2X fund which has done very well in a time of rising interest rates. While I may not be rich, I am educated and quite capable of making decisions. Banning these investments smacks of authority limiting my ability to make decisions. Let's not assume we are all dopes. My broker and ProShares warn me of the risks of leverage on a recurring basis. I'm a big boy.

David Nathanson Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Against. Unreasonable to take away. The govt does not know my finances or abilities better than I do. I must be able to choose how I invest.

If there are new restrictions on buying or selling such investments, that could be terribly punitive to current holders. We already saw huge unfairness when investors were restricted from buying GME last year. Let's not see that sort of mess again.

Gladys Lopez Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I am vehemently opposed to restrictions on my right to invest in leveraged instruments. These leverage instruments help to hedge my portfolio. These restrictions are contrary to open markets and capitalism. It should be up to the investor to research and understand risks and not the nanny state! The investor and not the regulator should be the one to determine what kind of investment is right for him/her; furthermore, no regulations should be created to impede the public investment choice of investors. Public investments should not be just for the privileged, but for everyone.