Skip to main content

Blake Shipley Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

There has never been a period in human history where more knowledge is readily available to the average person. In a time where in depth explanations of these products can be found within 30 seconds, not to mention detailed discussion boards, it's unreasonable to add more restrictions to retail investors.

You should be focusing on removing restrictions instead.

Leveraged and inverse funds provide a readily understood and well regulated option for retail investors to effectively hedge themselves or to take on more risk when desired.

Rory OBrien Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

The inverse funds are a key component of my investment strategy and help me to profit when markets are falling. Without this strategy I would not be able to easily manage losses and be at the mercy of the market. It is imperative that these funds be available for me to assure that my investments dont crash with the market as they are my only source of income in my retirement. I use them sparingly and manage my risk appropriately. I this impossible to legislate free markets by limiting trading without causing irreparable harm to investors. We are adults who dont need a nanny State.

Brent Davenport Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Thank you for the proposed FINRA rule #22-08. It came to my attention when I saw an advertisement encouraging opposition to the bill from an obviously biased and hidden source (https://www.leteveryoneinvest.com). After brief research it seems to me to be a very valuable rule to keep small investors from gambling away their life's savings, and keep predatory firms from being able to trick people. Knowledge and education is the best path when investing, and this bills provides for both.