Skip to main content

Susan Berge Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Please do NOT restrict my ability to trade leveraged and/or inverse funds. Inverse funds, particularly, are a way for small investors to protect themselves against market declines. Most of us can't afford to short stocks or Index funds, so inverse funds are the only way to profit in a down market. Taking away that option is a terrible idea. In addition, leveraged funds are a great help for those who don't have huge amounts of money to invest. Well-timed trades yield a better result than plain-vanilla Index funds.

David Bichler Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Why should only the large investor get the right to protect their investments during a downturn in the market, which they probably controlled and then not allow the small investor to equally protect their investment when the market goes down, something they probably had nothing to do with the downturn. The playing field should be the same for all investors, not just a small percentage of very wealthy investors. The large investor forces the market down and why should the small investor bears the entire brunt of the downturn while the wealthy investor makes a large profit via inverse funds.

Boone Trace Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Leverage and inverse funds are a low cost way to increase the diversification and/or offset risk at a low cost. I wish you people would leave things alone. People that are ignorant and untrained will still find their way to do stupid things no matter how you try to protect them. If you promote real education on these matters in connection with existing channels that would be more productive. Just leave me alone.