Skip to main content

Alfred Fishbeck Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I am opposed to the Subject rule #S7-24-15 This is clearly an infringement on the rights of the people to have the flexibility they need to make the necessary investments needed to reduce risk is a portfolio of investments. Inverse and leverage funds allow a simpler way than using options to protect investments from market changes. They allow it to be done without using margin loans to provide the same type of protection.

Richard Siroky Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I oppose any restrictions that would limit or prevent my ability to trade leveraged or inverse funds as part of my investment and trading strategy. These instruments provide a means to hedge investments in volatile market conditions. Investing in the market in general requires accepting a certain level of risk and I understand the risks associated with leveraged and inverse funds. Therefore, I do not want or need additional restrictions implemented for these instruments.

Kim-Anh Tran Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I strongly believe that I as an investor should be able to choose the public investment that are right for me. I should not have to go through any special process or test before I can invest in public securities like leveraged and inverse funds. I found leveraged and inversed funds are important to protect my investments when stocks went down, I can leverage the loss with inverse funds. When the market on the downtrend, the inverse funds help me to gain my retirement funds. I hope FINRA will consider my request