Skip to main content

Greg Pliler Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

My primary concern with this notice is the following statement: "whether the current regulatory framework, which was adopted at a time when the majority of individuals accessed financial products through financial professionals, rather than through self-directed platforms, is appropriately tailored to address current concerns raised by complex products and options." The concern is that this will inhibit those of us that have the ability to research and understand the complexity of these investment opportunities and instead create barriers to retail investor wealth - 1) through the ability t

Dietmar Scherf Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Comments: As a private investor I have utilized ETFs for about 20 years and leveraged/inverse investment vehicles for approx. 12 years or so. These vehicles (specifically leveraged/inverse ETFs/ETNs) have been extremely helpful to enhance the profitability of my investment portfolio/strategy resulting in protecting my investments when these vehicles are used as hedge instruments, and in trading to generate additional profits (incl. short-term profits) when markets, a commodity, a sector, etc. show greater volatility and tend to move stronger in one or the other direction.

Dylan Timms Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Comments: I believe that the foundation of a free market is the ability to choose the financial decisions that we as people make. While I understand that regulation is necessary to create a safe market environment with lower risk and less chance of inexperienced losses, there could be no possible way in which new regulations would be fair to all types of investors. A small percentage of investors outside of firms also trade leveraged ETFs or equities, and this will directly impact their investment goals or strategies that are currently in place.