Dear Regulators, As an investor, I, not regulators, should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I agree that there should be warning agreements that need to be checked that an investor understands what they are getting into and the risks, JUST AS ALREADY EXISTS. NO FURTHER CUMBERSOME AND RESTRICTING REGULATION IS NECESSARY.

I find the inverse funds etfs are a convenient way to trade market trends. The prospectuses and notices to investors have made me aware of the potential for financial loss in using these investment instruments so I am careful and vigilant in my use thereof. I don't feel further regulation is warranted and I believe it would serve to put undo restrictions on investors.

Most [REDACTED] things you guys have done. Its almost like you want people to not be able yo hedge the downturn so everyone becomes poor. Meanwhile you also create a barrier for poorer individuals to miss good opportunities by requiring kyc and accredited investors to to continue earning.. Honestly i think yall should just quit lol obviously not doing anything to protect investors at all today and seem like you guys want them to be hurt

Leveraged and inverse funds are important part of risk management. These funds make it possible to use a small percentage of capital to risk manage the other side of a trade. There are plenty of SEC / FINRA regulation as well as documentation on investments to understand the risk. Should investors ignore reading the documents of any and all investments that is the investors choice.

I should be able to choose the public investment that is right for me and my family. Public investment should not just for privileged few. FINRA interest shows private few to get benefit out of PUBLIC fund. I object the restrictions or any measure introduce by FINRA on publicly traded fund.

I vehemently disagree with a government entity telling/restricting how I invest my capital. Investing shouldn't be a privilege for the rich only, and that is what this ridiculous consideration is. You will allow banks to get back into business with insider traders like Bill Hwang (how'd that workout by the way?) but want to restrict how the average person invests. Absurd. If your objective is to "protect the average person" from losing money in risky investments then it makes no sense.

I want to be free to invest in any of the financial instruments listed above.

I appose restrictions to my right to invest. I am capable of making the decision to invest in an inverse fund to hedge risk for my traditional equities. I do not feel it is necessary to restrict my access to these investements.

I oppose RESTRICTIONS TO MY RIGHT TO INVEST

I, not regulators should dictate what type of investment and type of investment availability to the public that are suitable for me and my family. Therefore regulations should not be an obstacle to freely invest in our democratic society. What regulators should have done is to tell investment institutions to spell out the purpose of the fund in plain English & to the point.