Skip to main content

Jonathan Kim Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

The proposed rule is another example of limiting small investors and speculators with the excuse of protecting them. This paternalistic approach only favors the larger investors by making various investment instruments and strategies more difficult to access. This is quite interesting considering it is occurring at a time when it is clear that they will become especially useful. I am completely against this rule. It is becoming more clear that not everyones money is the same. Some will have access and others are excluded because they are deemed to be not intelligent enough.

James Walker Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Dear regulators: I OPPOSE RESTRICTIONS TO MY RIGHT TO INVEST!! I believe that I should be able to choose public investments that are right for me and that they should be made available to everyone. I take responsibility for my actions and decisions in all aspects of my life and do not want the government to limit or restrict my investment decisions. I use leverage and inverse funds in part to balance my portfolio especially in these times of high volatility and uncertain economic and global situations.