The Nanny State should stay out of telling investors how to invest. Look how brilliant it has been in controlling inflation, actually by bringing it on. (And soon to bring on recession by it's policies.) No test, no restrictions!

The risks of trading leveraged and inverse ETFs are well known. Retail traders who can trade options or futures should be able to trade such ETFs without restriction. Its less expensive and easier to do than trading options and futures and dealing with margin etc.

I don't think it's right to limit my investment opportunity

I am totally opposed to the Proposed Rule #S7-24-15 for the following reasons: 1. I am a small investor that has invested in leverage funds for greater than 20 years and am quite capable of understanding the risks of using leverage funds. In fact, I find it offensive that a regulator would question my knowledge of the market by using some gimmick like passing a special test related to my understanding of the pit falls of leverage funds. 2. Because I am a small investor, I prefer not to short stocks.

I strongly oppose restrictions to my right to invest. I should be able to choos the public investments that are right for myself. Why are you all even considering making us go through a special process and placing these kinds of restrictions in general. I don't have much. I am a hardworking young lady just trying to make a place for myself in this world. I should be able to use my hard earned money to invest in the way that I choose. This is America. I am just trying to have the American dream. Please please please do not place these restrictions on us. I beg you please!!

Leveraged and Unleveraged etf have been used to hedge against the downward market trend for a while not only by sophisticated user but the likes of people who actively manage there brokerage account. Taking it away would not only provide less tools for a retail investor like me but also only benefit only the rich who qualify as accredited investors. There are simply not many options for retail investors to obtain hedges without investing too much money.

The individual small investor should have access to any and all investment vehicles available without arbitrary restrictions. This includes leveraged and inverse instruments as well as institutional products if the individual has sufficient capital to invest in these products.

I oppose the proposed restrictions to accessing leveraged ETFs. Creating a two tier system for wealthy elites verses main street investors is not acceptable. It would be wholly inappropriate to force investors out of leveraged positions during a major market correction simply because the SEC has deemed poor people as idiots. I am disgusted with the SEC's pervasive attitude that main street investors don't understand how to manage leverage. The fact the SEC continues to pursue limitations to expand the "qualified investor" concept just makes it look like the SEC is trying to rig the system.

Dear Sir/Madam: I oppose restrictions to my right to invest. I should be able to choose the investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all, not just a chose few. Matter-of-fact, I think we should abolish the current Initial Public Offering process and democratize that process like it is done by the largest democracy on the planet, India. In India, an IPO is open to every common man who is interested in the IPO. She/he just needs to submit an application at the local bank and show that she has funds for however many shares she is applying for.

This is outrageous! I appreciate the service Titan offers me as I don't have time to research the market daily to analyze my associated costs and risks. Titan's portfolio allows me to spend my time doing what I like and what I'm good at, much like the hedge fund managers for the wealthy 1% that allow them to spend their valuable time on other activities besides market research.