Skip to main content

Michael Basso Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I oppose restrictions to limit my right to invest in leveraged or Inverse funds. I should be the one to decide if I use these funds and not the regulators. Leverage and Inverse funds are very important part of my Portfolio strategy and by limiting them will adversely affect my investment options. I have used both leveraged and Inverse funds for many years and understand their usage.

Gail Joseph Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. It is very important that I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities. I am capable of understanding investments and their risks. As such, I should be allowed to invest in any securities as it is my right to free choice as a citizen of this great country.

Oscar Jennings Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

To whom it may concern: It should be my choice as to where I invest my hard earned money. I should not have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, or leveraged and inverse funds. I am perfectly capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. I do not want nor need these measures imposed on me. Thank you.

Mark Lynch Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Gentlemen, I am a fully accredited investor who selects from wide body of publicly available investments, including currencies, commodities, equities, and fixed income, both long and inverse, predominantly through ETF's. I fully understand the risks inherent in investing, especially the ramifications of investing in inverse funds, which reset daily. I use inverse ETF's to hedge and protect my investments, especially in markets that are trending lower.