Skip to main content

Robert Piettri Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I strongly oppose your these unnecessary regulations on inverse and leveraged etf's. Today's investors are very well informed of these and similar investment vehicles and we do not need your meddling in our choices!

You should be looking into ways to better regulate news driven, high speed algorithmic trading where computers key in on pre programed key phrases and can spike or crash stocks as much as 50-60% in after hours trading where only the so called "big boys" can trade millions of shares in a matter of seconds!

Reynaldo Solis Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

No one needs any measure of exam in order to invest. Any one can and should be able to choose public investments that are right for me and my family in any way shape or form. Public investment can and should always remain available to the public. No one should be excluded in any way shape or form. What is being done is trampling on the rights of the private citizen as a worker and as a provider. I understand fully leveraged and inverse funds and their risk. Many investments are used in order to protect and hedge to seek a return. In my time frame that i have invested.

Elisa Trombetta Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Consider additional warnings on trading platforms so investors better understand the risks, but please DO NOT restrict trading in ProShares for retail investors. My husband and I invest carefully and have done quite well with ProShares funds in the past. Other investors' ignorance or carelessness should not be a reason to keep us and others like us from investing as we wish in the funds we choose.