Skip to main content

Michael Ross Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I resent the fact that you're considering a net worth test before I'm allowed to continue to use certain leveraged or inverse ETFs. Such products allow the average investor - perhaps someone that wouldn't be considered "high net worth" - to responsibly hedge against certain eventualities. If you allow hedge fund managers to do so, why shouldn't these investments be readily available to everyone?

Steven DeRose Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I am writing in response to the proposal to regulate the use of inverse ETFs and leveraged funds. I strongly oppose the federal government regulating which public investments I can and cannot invest in for myself and my family, as well as any additional regulatory processes required to make an investment of my choosing. There are already plenty of disclosures that address the potential risks and we do not need the government additional additional hurdles that prevent me from investing my own money.

Andy Roberts Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I should be able to choose investments and the risk i am willing to accept. Leveraged and inverse funds are an important element of my investment strategy. These investments should be available to all the public and not just the privileged. Please do not restrict the opportunity to invest in leveraged funds. There is already a notice of the risk and it is well communicated to investors. Please do not put limits on who can invest in these products. Thank you