Skip to main content

Keith Blackwell Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Regulators,

I oppose restrictions to my right to invest in leveraged or inverse funds. These funds are important to my investment strategies and represent a very limited part of my overall financial portfolio. These funds help me hedge my investments.

Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just a select few. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their associated risks and should not have to take a test or special process in order to do so.

Phyllis Warden Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I object to government regulators deciding what I can and cannot do with my investable funds. I receive a prospectus when I buy products that require them, and the burden is on me to make an informed decision. I do not want to have to take any special courses or pass any tests or explain my reasoning to someone outside my family. I have an investment advisor with whom I can discuss whether something is appropriate for me, and that, along with my intelligence and American citizenship should be enough.

Christy Garrett Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Please think about this: the proper place of government regulation of investing is to make markets honest....to prevent one party from cheating or stealing from another. So for example, you could enforce honest prospectus language. Another appropriate regulation would be to ensure an equal playing ground for all investors. Regulations could support every investor's access to these funds and not just an elite group. Guess what - all investing is risky. All of it. Even the investments considered "safe", such as money market funds or treasuries, have risks (erosion by inflation).