Skip to main content

Nicholas Kochek Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Free trade is free trade. I use inverse leveraged funds to help hedge my portfolio. In these volatile markets these are necessary tools to mitigate your personal risk. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leverage and inverse funds. I completely understand leverage and inverse funds and their risks. Public investments should be available to all of the public not just the privileged.

Jordan Walters Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I alone know what risk exposure is acceptable for me, not FINRA regulators. I have spent two years fine tuning a strategy that lets me vary my risk exposure using a mix of standard and leveraged funds to take advantage of market behavior. Blocking access to these leveraged funds will wreak havoc on myself and others in my position who have spent the time and energy to create smart and intelligent plans to effectively use these tools. Block access will hurt us badly and for what reason?

Brian Kent Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I do not believe regulators should be able to choose which investments may be proper for me to invest in. Leveraged investments allow me to achieve the level of returns that I want with only having to risk 1/2 to 1/3 of the amount of money that I normally would. Inverse funds help me hedge against losing gains in other funds. Having a well rounded portfolio is always better than half a strategy. Leaving certain types of investments available only to the privileged doesn't seem like the way to run a free and open market system.