Skip to main content

Jack Weber Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Please oppose any restrictions on my right to use my money as I deem fit. I understand the risk of leveraged funds and do not require any special measures imposed on me. I can't help but believe you really don't care about my welfare but only care about corporations possibly losing capital. Why would things change now when things did not change during the longest bull run in the history of the market?

Mary DeField Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

It's not the job of regulators to decide which public investments I want to use for myself and family. I've used inverse funds for years and understand leveraged and inverse funds and how they work. I shouldn't have to go through a special process like passing a test. It should be my decision alone. Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategy. During 08 I did well they helped hedge my investments.

Richard Popp Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Taking away my ability to purchase inverse and leveraged ETFs is insulting to the retail investor. The current tools available to today's investors have leveled the playing field, with retail having the ability to use tools unavailable in the past. These tools allow me to offset my core positions without having to sell the underlying securities. They also allow me to participate in the declining market vs. sitting only in cash. Leveraged ETFs enable me to effectively borrow funds vs. having a margin account and managing the additional risk of margin calls.

George Yablonsky Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I should be able to choose any publicly available investment product that I want. I have been investing for over 50 years and know the ramifications of using leveraged and inverse funds. They are definitely something that one should use only when certain opportunities come up.
They have a place in a lot of peoples' portfolios. I use them to hedge certain other investments, as I'm sure other people do too.