Skip to main content

Shadrach Scott Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I am very concerned that you are thinking of taking away import investing funds from the general public like leveraged and inverse funds. These are important investing products that all investors should have access to trade not just privileged investors. Stop trying to limit what is available to me as an investor. These leveraged and inverse funds are very important to me and many retail investors and our investing strategy.

Hunter Greer Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

May 6 Revised submission: First let me say that I am a Roosevelt supporter (Teddy and FDR), not anti-government. I have traded ProFunds, which offer shorts and leverage, for about ten years. ProFunds is my favorite fund family. I do not care about leverage, but I do care about being able to short (inverse funds). I do not have an advisor or broker, and I never have or will. Common knowledge is that advisors underperform markets by the amount of their fees.

Travis Palmer Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I oppose the possibility of restrictions being placed on my rights to invest in public investment vehicles. I should be able to choose what investments are right for me. Investments should be available to everyone not just who regulators deem worthy. I use leveraged and inverse funds to hedge positions and they are an important part of my strategies. There shouldnt be any kind of special education or test people have to go through to invest in public investment vehicles. When investing in these funds the broker general makes you accept a page anyway verifying you understand the risks.